August 2, 2026 — EU AI Act full compliance deadline · 114 days remaining
EU AI Act Compliance Platform

Organisations that get ahead of the AI Act win board confidence, investor trust, and enterprise contracts. Most are still waiting.

Klarr tells you exactly where your organisation stands under the EU AI Act — which tools you use qualify as AI systems, what obligations apply, and what to fix before August 2, 2026.

Try free assessment → Or meet Saga →
4
Months to deadline
€35M
Maximum fine per violation
+50%
Of enterprises unprepared
8
Compliance dimensions assessed
🇩🇪
Hetzner Germany
Infrastructure hosted on German-regulated servers. No US data routing.
🇫🇷
Mistral AI France
AI inference via European-native models. No dependence on US hyperscalers.
🇩🇰
Cordero Management Denmark
Operated from Copenhagen. EU jurisdiction. Legal and advisory accountability here.
🇪🇺
GDPR Native
Designed from the ground up under EU data protection law. No bolt-on compliance.
🤝
AI Pact applicant
Registered with the European AI Office AI Pact. Pillar I network member. Pillar II pledges submitted April 2026.
01

How it works

Step 01

Understand what counts as an AI system

Not every tool with "AI" in the name qualifies — and some that don't will. Klarr walks you through a structured intake: what the system does, who it affects, and whether it meets the EU AI Act definition under Article 3. No legal background required.

Step 02

Classify risk and obligation

Klarr maps each system against the EU AI Act annexes. Prohibited, high-risk, GPAI, or minimal — with the specific articles and documentation obligations that apply to your situation.

Step 03

Track and report readiness

Monitor progress across eight compliance dimensions. Export board-ready reports. Assign tasks to owners. Know your readiness stage at any moment — and what it takes to advance.

Live product preview
What your compliance dashboard looks like
Cordero Management
Dashboard AI Systems Tasks Reports Settings
Current stage
Unaware
Next: Inventoried — begin AI system intake
AI Systems
0
identified
High-risk
—
classified
Tasks open
—
assigned
Days to deadline
—
Aug 2, 2026
System name Vendor Risk tier Stage Open tasks

Your full compliance picture — every system, every obligation, every open task — visible from day one.

02

Eight dimensions of compliance

01 Risk Classification Map every system to its correct EU AI Act category. + See what this involves
Structured mapping against Annex III categories — Prohibited, High-risk, GPAI, or Minimal — with justification documented per system. Determines every other obligation that follows.Art. 6 · Annex III
02 Data Governance Training data documentation, bias testing, quality controls. + See what this involves
For high-risk systems: training data provenance, bias and discrimination testing, data quality assessment, and documentation of data preparation practices.Art. 10
03 Technical Documentation System design records, performance benchmarks, architecture. + See what this involves
Mandatory technical file covering general description, design specifications, development methods, validation and testing results, and monitoring procedures.Art. 11 · Annex IV
04 Transparency Disclosure obligations, user information, AI labelling. + See what this involves
Requirements to inform users when interacting with AI systems, disclose capabilities and limitations, and label AI-generated content. Applies broadly — not just to high-risk systems.Art. 13 · Art. 50
05 Human Oversight Override mechanisms, human-in-the-loop controls, escalation. + See what this involves
High-risk systems must be designed to allow human intervention, override, or shutdown. Deployers must assign individuals responsible for oversight and establish escalation pathways.Art. 14
06 Accuracy & Robustness Performance monitoring, error tracking, adversarial resilience. + See what this involves
Ongoing performance benchmarking, error rate tracking, cybersecurity robustness assessment, and resilience testing against adversarial inputs for high-risk systems.Art. 15
07 Conformity Assessment Self-assessment or third-party audit readiness for CE marking. + See what this involves
High-risk systems require a conformity assessment before market placement — either self-assessed or via a notified body, depending on the category. CE marking follows successful assessment.Art. 43
08 Post-Market Monitoring Incident reporting, serious risk escalation, surveillance. + See what this involves
Continuous monitoring after deployment. Serious incidents and near-misses must be reported to national authorities. Deployers must maintain a post-market monitoring plan and document findings.Art. 72 · Art. 73
03

Readiness stages

Stage 01UnawareNo inventory. No classification. Exposure unknown and unmanaged.
Stage 02InventoriedAI systems identified and documented. Risk tiers not yet assigned.
Stage 03AssessedRisk classification complete. Obligations identified per system.
Stage 04ControlledDocumentation, oversight, and monitoring mechanisms in place.
Stage 05CompliantAll obligations met. Audit-ready. Board-reportable. Deadline secure.
04

Pricing

What you are replacing

EU AI Act compliance is not a one-time legal review. It requires continuous inventory management, classification, task ownership across business units, board reporting, and post-market monitoring — for every AI system you deploy.

Most enterprises approaching this today are doing so with a combination of external consultants, legal hours, and internal coordination that was never designed for this regulation. That approach costs more, takes longer, and produces documentation that requires yet another round of review to be audit-ready.

Klarr replaces that process. The cost comparison is not with other SaaS tools. It is with the alternative.

Cost of the alternative
External consultant — initial AI assessment3–5 days at €1,500–2,500/day. No ongoing updates included.
€7,500–12,500
Legal review — one high-risk systemPer system, per annual update cycle.
€3,000–6,000
Internal coordination overhead8–15 hrs/month across inventory, tasks, and board prep.
€1,200–2,400/mo
KlarrAI system assessment, gap scoring, board report, regulatory alerts. From €149/mo.
from €149/mo

Based on EU market consulting day rates. Your costs will vary. The direction will not.

Starter
€149
per month · or €1,490/year

For startups, SMEs, and any organisation that needs to answer their board or investors on AI Act exposure — without an enterprise budget.

  • Up to 3 AI systems assessed
  • Risk classification (Article 3 + Annex III)
  • Compliance gap score
  • Board & investor report export
  • Regulatory deadline alerts
  • Email support
Professional
€499
per month · or €4,990/year

For growing organisations with multiple AI tools, a legal or compliance function, and a board that expects answers.

  • Up to 10 AI systems assessed
  • All 8 compliance dimensions
  • Board & investor report export
  • Multi-user access
  • Article-level guidance
  • Governance policy template (Ingrid)
  • Priority regulatory alerts
Enterprise
Custom
bespoke engagement

For complex organisations requiring tailored assessment, workshop delivery, and ongoing advisory.

  • On-demand single assessment from €499
  • Clinical, financial & HR AI add-ons available
  • On-site assessment
  • Legal review integration
  • Executive briefings
  • SLA-backed advisory

Turn the EU AI Act from a liability into a competitive advantage.

Know where you stand before your board, your investors, or a regulator asks. Request access — or reach us directly.

Klarr is a compliance intelligence platform, not a law firm. Nothing on this platform constitutes legal advice. Output from Klarr should be reviewed with qualified legal counsel before reliance in regulatory, contractual, or enforcement contexts. Cordero Management ApS accepts no liability for decisions made based solely on platform output.